The blog for Peter T. Chattaway, film critic, journalist, religion junkie, etc. Not all posts will be film-related, but film will always be just around the corner.
Prior to the J.J. Abrams movie that came out last summer, most of the main Star Trek characters had been played by only one actor apiece. But one glaring exception to this rule was the character of Spock.
Already, in the early 1970s, the adult Spock had gone back in time to visit his younger self in an episode of the animated series; and then, in the 1980s, two of the original movies depicted his birth and the stages of his growth from childhood to young adulthood, using various actors along the way. So when Abrams revisited this territory last summer, he basically just added a new set of faces to the list of people who have played one of Star Trek's defining characters.
Since I am a compulsive list-maker, screen-grabber and continuity nut, I figured I would create a gallery of all the various actors (and one possible prop or special effect) that have played Spock over the years, arranged according to the age of the character at the time of the image in question.
And since Leonard Nimoy has played the character at multiple ages himself, I have settled on just a few images of him at key points in the adult Spock's life and interspersed them below, too. (You might think that all of Nimoy's pictures would come after the pictures of all the various "young Spocks", but you'd be wrong: according to the current official Star Trek chronology, the original series pilot 'The Cage' takes place at a time when Spock would have been only 22 years old, and at least two actors have officially portrayed Spock at slightly older ages.)
And so, without further ado, the gallery -- followed by a few extra notes and bonus pictures at the end:
Spock, newborn -- a prop or special effect?
Spock, newborn -- Jenna Vaughn, age 0
Spock, age 7 -- voice of Billy Simpson, age ?
Spock, age 9 -- Carl Steven, age ?
Spock, age ? -- Jacob Kogan, age 12
Spock, age 13 -- Vadia Potenza, age 12
Spock, age 17 -- Stephen Manley, age 18
Spock, age 22 -- Leonard Nimoy, age 33
Spock, age 25 -- Joe W. Davis, age ?
Spock, age 26 or 28 -- Zachary Quinto, age 30
Spock, age 34 -- Leonard Nimoy, age 35
Spock, age 39 or 41 -- Leonard Nimoy, age 47
Spock, age 53 -- Leonard Nimoy, age 52
Spock, age 61 -- Leonard Nimoy, age 60
Spock, age 136 -- Leonard Nimoy, age 60
Spock, age 155 -- Leonard Nimoy, age 77
Bonus picture: In the original-series episode 'The Deadly Years', Spock, who would have been about 35 years old, is afflicted by a condition that rapidly ages him to "the high side of 100" and beyond, as Dr. McCoy puts it. This is how the make-up artists imagined an old Spock would look at the time:
And now for a few footnotes:
First, there is admittedly some ambiguity around the physical age of Spock past his death in Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (1982), which took place when he was 53, and his subsequent resurrection in Star Trek III: The Search for Spock (1984). The "Genesis wave" regenerated his cells and accelerated his growth from childhood to adulthood, but it did not necessarily leave him at the exact same age at which he died.
Second, the birth of Spock has been depicted twice so far, but there are reasons to question the canonicity of both versions, quite apart from the fact that the two versions don't quite match.
In Star Trek V: The Final Frontier (1989), Spock is apparently born in a cave and handed straight to his father Sarek, even though he is still covered in post-natal muck. However, this scene is a telepathic projection created by Spock's older half-brother Sybok as part of his attempt to brainwash Spock, and one could certainly argue that Sybok gets some of the details wrong.
The birth of Spock -- or, rather, what happened immediately afterwards -- was also filmed for J.J. Abrams' Star Trek, and in this case, Spock is apparently born outdoors in broad daylight, and then cleaned and handed to his mother just before Sarek arrives to take a look at the baby. But the scene was deleted from the film itself, so its canonicity is open to question.
Incidentally, I have been unable to confirm whether the baby we see in ST5:TFF was a real baby or just a prop. The behind-the-scenes photo below indicates that it may have been a prop, but it is also possible that the man in the photo is holding a doll that served as a stand-in of sorts for a real baby:
Finally, regarding the ambiguity around the dating of two of the photos:
The photo of Zachary Quinto says Spock is "26 or 28" because it depends on when you date the character's birth. The relevant scene from the J.J. Abrams movie takes place in 2258, and according to the official Star Trek chronology, Spock was born in 2232 -- one year before the birth of Kirk and therefore one year before Nero came back in time and created a brand new alternate timeline. So Spock ought to be 26 in that photo. However, the deleted scene of Spock's birth from that same movie bears the date 2230, so on the movie's own terms, Spock would have to be 28. But the scene was deleted, so it isn't necessarily canon; and just as the special effects weren't finished yet, perhaps the subtitles, too, could have been tweaked to fit the existing chronology.
Meanwhile, the photo of Leonard Nimoy from Star Trek: The Motion Picture (1979) says Spock is "39 or 41" because the dating of that movie is somewhat vague, and it depends on which of the official chronologies you follow. You can read more about that debate here.
Here are the figures for the past weekend, arranged from those that owe the highest percentage of their take to the Canadian box office to those that owe the lowest.
Nine -- CDN $557,515 -- N.AM $5,830,585 -- 9.6% Invictus -- CDN $2,120,000 -- N.AM $23,365,000 -- 9.1% Did You Hear about the Morgans? -- CDN $1,390,000 -- N.AM $15,597,000 -- 8.9% Avatar -- CDN $18,840,000 -- N.AM $212,711,184 -- 8.9% Up in the Air -- CDN $2,100,000 -- N.AM $24,518,000 -- 8.6% Sherlock Holmes -- CDN $4,130,000 -- N.AM $65,380,000 -- 6.3% The Princess and the Frog -- CDN $3,820,000 -- N.AM $63,679,289 -- 6.0% It's Complicated -- CDN $1,280,000 -- N.AM $22,100,820 -- 5.8% Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel -- CDN $3,800,000 -- N.AM $75,589,048 -- 5.0% The Blind Side -- CDN $7,900,000 -- N.AM $184,387,000 -- 4.3%
I have never seen Dangerous Minds, but I have certainly seen enough "inspirational teacher" movies -- and enough Harry Potter movies -- to get a big kick out of this:
1.Clash of the Titans has a new trailer and a new tagline ("Damn the gods!"), and it looks to me like the new film might not be as forgiving of Zeus and his bloodthirsty ways as the original film was:
Sam Worthington, who plays Perseus in the movie and is also currently onscreen in Avatar, told the Los Angeles Times last week that the filmmakers will be reuniting next month for a round of reshoots -- only two months before the film's release date in March. Ordinarily this sort of last-minute retooling might be interpreted as a sign of trouble, but Ain't It Cool News assures us that the reshoots would have been done a lot sooner if it weren't for the fact that Liam Neeson, who plays Zeus in the movie, was too busy shooting The A-Team until now. (He's playing Hannibal, i.e. the George Peppard role, in that one.)
2.The Los Angeles Times says the follow-up to 300 (2006) will now be a prequel, rather than a sequel. Frank Miller says he is going to base it on the Battle of Marathon, which took place ten years before the battles depicted in 300 ... but he is also calling the story Xerxes, which is odd, because the Persian king at the time of Marathon was not Xerxes but his father Darius.
3. The first episodes of Spartacus:Blood and Sand won't be aired for another month, but the Starz network has alreadyordered a second season, which will go by the name Spartacus: Vengeance. A rather bloody trailer for this show recently went online, too; make of it what you will:
Here are the figures for the past weekend, arranged from those that owe the highest percentage of their take to the Canadian box office to those that owe the lowest.
Brothers -- CDN $2,220,000 -- N.AM $22,349,862 -- 9.9% 2012 -- CDN $15,540,000 -- N.AM $159,028,696 -- 9.8% Up in the Air -- CDN $802,223 -- N.AM $8,215,704 -- 9.8% Disney's A Christmas Carol -- CDN $12,530,000 -- N.AM $130,813,354 -- 9.6% Invictus -- CDN $1,440,000 -- N.AM $15,877,956 -- 9.1% Did You Hear about the Morgans? -- CDN $588,097 -- N.AM $6,616,571 -- 8.9% The Twilight Saga: New Moon -- CDN $23,960,000 -- N.AM $274,598,319 -- 8.7% Avatar -- CDN $6,260,000 -- N.AM $77,025,481 -- 8.1% The Princess and the Frog -- CDN $2,490,000 -- N.AM $44,717,721 -- 5.6% The Blind Side -- CDN $7,070,000 -- N.AM $164,725,525 -- 4.3%
A couple of discrepancies: 2012 was #9 on the Canadian chart (it was #11 in North America as a whole), while Old Dogs was #10 on the North American chart (it was #11 in Canada).
One of the many interesting things about James Cameron's Avatar is how utterly and completely it implicates the human race -- and thus its own audience -- in the atrocities that certain human characters commit against the N'avi, the humanoid species that lives on the alien moon of Pandora.
The evils of humanity are made pretty explicit in the script and in the performances, of course. But film is primarily a visual medium, and it is quite telling that, on at least two separate occasions, as violence is about to break out between the humans and the Na'vi, Cameron puts the humans on the left side of the screen and the Na'vi on the right side of the screen.
This is significant because, in our culture at least, we read from the left to the right, so we identify primarily with the left side of screen and then move towards the right. Somebody who moves to the right moves with us, while someone who moves to the left moves towards us.
Thus, in most movies, the vast majority of epic battle scenes begin with "our" side moving from left to right while "their" side moves in the opposite direction. Once the armies have clashed, of course, all bets are off, as soldiers from both sides move in all sorts of directions -- but this is generally how the battle scenes begin. So it is interesting to see Cameron reverse this approach.
The trailer itself contains a few of these shots. First, the humans:
And then, the Na'vi:
Compare this to the more conventional compositions in other films produced over the last several decades:
Spartacus (1960) -- Slaves on the left, Romans on the right:
Here are the figures for the past weekend, arranged from those that owe the highest percentage of their take to the Canadian box office to those that owe the lowest.
A couple of discrepancies: Planet 51 was #10 on the Canadian chart (it was #12 in North America as a whole), while Ninja Assassin was #10 on the North American chart (it was #12 in Canada).
I'm a sucker for movies that take place inside the human body, so I must note the following bit of news:
Variety and the MTV Movies Blog are reporting that James Cameron will produce -- but not direct -- a remake of Fantastic Voyage (1966; my comments) using the same digital 3D technology that he used on his upcoming movie Avatar.
The original story concerned a submarine that was miniaturized and injected into the body of a wounded scientist so that the crew of that submarine could remove a blood clot from within the scientist's brain. As such, the remake would seem to be a natural fit for Cameron, who not only specializes in effects-heavy science-fiction but has also done his share of submarine duty in The Abyss (1989), Titanic (1997) and a documentary or two.
But apparently he has no interest in actually directing the remake, which was previously attached to Roland Emmerich. So it is not yet clear who will actually make the film.
Back in January, I mentioned that Corbin Bernsen was shooting a movie in Kipling, Saskatchewan about a minister who experiences a crisis of faith. Now, the Regina Leader-Post reports that that movie, Rust, had its world premiere last Thursday in the small town where it was shot:
Rust, which is a prairie term for crop disease, is a drama that centres on Bernsen's character, a minister that's having a midlife crisis of faith. He returns to his hometown and while there, a tragedy strikes the town. The character is left to try and make sense of both the crime and his own lack of faith while battling the elements of a bitter Saskatchewan winter.
Art imitated life during the filming with the cast and crew having to film during days of bitter cold. While it made filming challenging, Bernsen is adamant it helped make the movie better. . . .
"There was a message in this thing about patience," said Bernsen, who served as producer, writer, director and actor for the project. "You know what it's like in the cold. It's like turning the motor over and it just doesn't want to start. I wanted that feeling of having to unlock from the frozen environment to let the story crack through the ice, as it were. Sometimes movies can do two things: They can move you through story, which most movies do, but they can also move you through environment, putting you in a place and feeling where you can feel yourself in a specific place.
"I wanted that as much as anything. You know how it is, in that cold nothing moves quickly."
The film apparently aired on the SCN network in Saskatchewan over the weekend, and it will be shown again, twice, on Boxing Day.
Here are the figures for the past weekend, arranged from those that owe the highest percentage of their take to the Canadian box office to those that owe the lowest.
A couple of discrepancies: Fantastic Mr. Fox was #10 on the Canadian chart (it was #11 in North America as a whole), while Everybody's Fine was #10 on the North American chart (it was #14 in Canada).
In the past, DougGresham has defended the recent Narnia films as faithful adaptations of the books or, alternatively, he has defended the changes that were made to the stories as a necessary part of the adaptation process. So it is interesting to see his latest comments regarding the upcoming film version of The Voyage of the Dawn Treader, posted at NarniaWeb.com:
Ian Kath: These movies, how well are they sticking to the originals, the books?
Douglas Gresham: Well, The Lion the Witch and The Wardrobe was very close to the original book because the book was written in such a way that lent itself to being transcribed into the film medium. Prince Caspian we had to make some fairly major changes because the book isn’t written that way. In this movie there are a lot of differences in it also to, as Hollywood says, “derive the plot”. I’m ambivalent as to whether they’re necessary or not, I don’t really think so. But thats the way they wanted to do it, and it was either that or not make a movie, so I said “well go ahead and do it”. It will be very interesting to see the audiences reactions.
…..
Ian Kath: It’s an amazing amount of work that we’ve put into this, and I just love what we’ve done, and if the story is as good as the work and the passion that we’ve put into it..
Douglas Gresham: I think the story in the book is better but it’s still a great story.
For what it's worth, I still haven't listened to the original audio recording of this interview, but I think the person who transcribed the bits above may have misheard the phrase "drive the plot". Although, given the way these films have turned out, "derive the plot" would certainly be one way of putting it!
Here are the figures for the past weekend, arranged from those that owe the highest percentage of their take to the Canadian box office to those that owe the lowest.
The Road -- CDN $205,247 -- N.AM $1,977,453 -- 10.4% 2012 -- CDN $12,750,000 -- N.AM $138,451,427 -- 9.2% Disney's A Christmas Carol -- CDN $9,260,000 -- N.AM $104,927,816 -- 8.8% The Twilight Saga: New Moon -- CDN $17,760,000 -- N.AM $230,947,696 -- 7.7% Planet 51 -- CDN $2,190,000 -- N.AM $28,487,409 -- 7.7% Ninja Assassin -- CDN $1,240,000 -- N.AM $21,193,565 -- 5.9% Fantastic Mr. Fox -- CDN $464,534 -- N.AM $10,024,072 -- 4.6% Old Dogs -- CDN $1,090,000 -- N.AM $24,228,546 -- 4.5% The Blind Side -- CDN $3,420,000 -- N.AM $100,238,841 -- 3.4% Precious: Based on the Novel 'Push' by Sapphire -- CDN $373,879 -- N.AM $32,433,482 -- 1.2%
Born, raised, married, and still living in Vancouver, British Columbia. In addition to a 2005 Evangelical Press Association award-winning film column for BC Christian News, my articles have appeared in such publications as Books & Culture, Christianity Today, Bible Review, Faith Today, ChristianWeek, the Vancouver Courier, the Vancouver Sun, the Georgia Straight and Beliefnet.com. I am a member of the Vancouver Film Critics Circle and the Faith and Film Critics Circle.